Rational reconstruction of this kind can always be made. Given a certain state of knowledge, we can always reconstruct the process that led to this state. So when Thomas Kuhn Kuhn, T., 2001 says that the major transformation, a paradigm shift can not be represented as a logical progression, it probably involves a logical prediction shift the dominant paradigm in terms of the most dominant paradigm. In retrospect, do the same this is possible. We always present the previous history as a purposeful, logically unfolding process. It is true that a rational reconstruction of history can never be final. Historians of subsequent ages have always change the rational reconstruction of his predecessors.
This is inevitable and it is understandable, dominating paradigm change or latent "rival" that serves as the starting point of reconstruction, and therefore changing the purpose, under which adapts to the story. She always looks fit for contemporaries. To avoid this is impossible because we are all looking to position its current state. This adjustment by the views of contemporary history entails the exclusion of some and the inclusion of other, previously including elements in the line of development psychology, which is currently considered the backbone. The dominant paradigm, sooner or later inevitably changing, it is determined by the presence of latent to contemporary lines development history, which has always, despite the fact that they are, or can not or do not want to see contemporaries. They have always, since scientific knowledge has two components - to comprehend and unfathomable Cusa N., 1979, Frank, SL, 1990.
This is inevitable and it is understandable, dominating paradigm change or latent "rival" that serves as the starting point of reconstruction, and therefore changing the purpose, under which adapts to the story. She always looks fit for contemporaries. To avoid this is impossible because we are all looking to position its current state. This adjustment by the views of contemporary history entails the exclusion of some and the inclusion of other, previously including elements in the line of development psychology, which is currently considered the backbone. The dominant paradigm, sooner or later inevitably changing, it is determined by the presence of latent to contemporary lines development history, which has always, despite the fact that they are, or can not or do not want to see contemporaries. They have always, since scientific knowledge has two components - to comprehend and unfathomable Cusa N., 1979, Frank, SL, 1990.
Recent Comments