Tel Aviv, for his part, exercised a powerful information campaign about the fact that Obama is taking a tougher stance on Jewish settlements, reviewing the old agreement. Speaking in Cairo, Obama said the U.S. commitment to Israel 'Inseparable'. However, analysts pointed out the weak, but significant changes in the rhetoric that suggests that Obama does not coordinate its actions with Israel on issues of Iran and the Palestinians. Previously, Obama has already made it clear that his approach to the Palestinian problem would be more objective, rather than his predecessor, Bush has given Israel carte blanche to build settlements in the West Bank.
Recall that Bush in a letter in 2004 then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, called the 'irrealistichnym' design major evacuation of Israeli settlements in the framework of a peace agreement with the Palestinians, and Israeli leaders believe that by doing so the United States approved the idea of a future annexation of these settlements. Israel in turn angered Washington's demands to stop any construction in the territories, including East Jerusalem. Obama was' much more convincing than his predecessor, 'Israel warned that the path to peace in the Middle East lies through the creation of two states. The problem is that emphasize the skeptics in Europe, which is a friendly warning or a 'soft power' is unlikely to be enough to persuade Israeli leaders. Obama's plan is mainly based on the Saudi initiative seven years ago: Israel rejects the territories occupied in 1967, in exchange for recognition on the part of Arab world. This idea was supported in his article in the British media, Israeli President Shimon Peres.
However, Netanyahu, the former never a fan of the idea of two states returned to their starting positions: in order for Israel to go on negotiations with the Palestinians, they must recognize the Jewish character of the state, that 'absolutely impossible', because it means accepting the fact that they have no right to their land, and consent to be expelled. The question is whether U.S. president to move from words to deeds. As demonstrated by consideration of a decision to close Guantanamo, his advantage in both chambers is conditional, and 'the Israel lobby in the Senate is a' third party ', though not the smallest. " Meanwhile, Israel is appears to be committed all means gloss over the Palestinian problem. On the one hand, Israel's parliament is considering a proposal on how to make Jordan an official home to Palestinians living in the West Bank. The proposal assumes that the Palestinians living in the West Bank, must either be residents of Israel, or to obtain citizenship of Jordan, which, according to the authors of the project, in fact, is already a Palestinian state, because more than half of Jordanians are derived from the Palestinians. As you know, the Foreign Ministry summoned the Israeli ambassador of Jordan to deliver an official message from the rejection of this ideas and call on Israel to halt consideration of the bill. Full article at the website of the newspaper 'North Caucasus'
Recall that Bush in a letter in 2004 then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, called the 'irrealistichnym' design major evacuation of Israeli settlements in the framework of a peace agreement with the Palestinians, and Israeli leaders believe that by doing so the United States approved the idea of a future annexation of these settlements. Israel in turn angered Washington's demands to stop any construction in the territories, including East Jerusalem. Obama was' much more convincing than his predecessor, 'Israel warned that the path to peace in the Middle East lies through the creation of two states. The problem is that emphasize the skeptics in Europe, which is a friendly warning or a 'soft power' is unlikely to be enough to persuade Israeli leaders. Obama's plan is mainly based on the Saudi initiative seven years ago: Israel rejects the territories occupied in 1967, in exchange for recognition on the part of Arab world. This idea was supported in his article in the British media, Israeli President Shimon Peres.
However, Netanyahu, the former never a fan of the idea of two states returned to their starting positions: in order for Israel to go on negotiations with the Palestinians, they must recognize the Jewish character of the state, that 'absolutely impossible', because it means accepting the fact that they have no right to their land, and consent to be expelled. The question is whether U.S. president to move from words to deeds. As demonstrated by consideration of a decision to close Guantanamo, his advantage in both chambers is conditional, and 'the Israel lobby in the Senate is a' third party ', though not the smallest. " Meanwhile, Israel is appears to be committed all means gloss over the Palestinian problem. On the one hand, Israel's parliament is considering a proposal on how to make Jordan an official home to Palestinians living in the West Bank. The proposal assumes that the Palestinians living in the West Bank, must either be residents of Israel, or to obtain citizenship of Jordan, which, according to the authors of the project, in fact, is already a Palestinian state, because more than half of Jordanians are derived from the Palestinians. As you know, the Foreign Ministry summoned the Israeli ambassador of Jordan to deliver an official message from the rejection of this ideas and call on Israel to halt consideration of the bill. Full article at the website of the newspaper 'North Caucasus'
Posted by: |